A Nomic Digg

While writing a post about Digg (which may turn up tomorrow) I had a random thought that Digg's algorithm is like its constitution.

Which lead me another random but more interesting idea: A Nomic Digg where users propose and vote on changes to the algorithm. Ideally, Nomic Digg would be meta enough to make most of those algorithms changes automatically on its own right after voting.

One of the major ironies about Digg is that the community submits and diggs stories, but they don't have any input into the algorithm that determines quality and promotes stories to the front page. Nomic Digg would resolve that problem by opening up algorithm changes to the community.

If nothing else it's an interesting thought experiment: what would happen to the Digg community if it could change its own constitution? Would it grow in a stable way... or would it implode?

Comments

Yoz says...

Firstly, an introduction/declaration of interest - I'm a Developer Advocate for Ning, the social software playground. What Ning allows users to do is clone existing Ning apps for themselves and then tweak the app source code. The apps use the Ning Content Store for their data, which is a giant object DB that allows any app to query not just its own objects but the whole of Ning.

The reason I'm explaining all this is that itmay provide an excellent testbed for what you're proposing. As well as voting on changes to the code, users could actually implement those changes by cloning an app and tweaking the code for themselves. The database of submitted links would be shared amongst all the apps, and each app could then layer their own scoring systems on top of the data. Users could hop from clone to clone to find the rankings that most closely matched their own preferences.

To get started, take a look at quite a successful Digg clone that one of our users built: CCHits. It's focused on music, but probably wouldn't be too hard to tweak to deal with more traditional Digg links. If you want to get in touch: yoz(at)ning.com.

Posted on Jul 27, 2006
Boris Anthony says...

I say implode. Too many people more interested in "hey let's see how fast we can take it down" rather than "let us a build a stable and democratic place where all can live happily"...

Democracy, like all other things: in moderation.

Also I do not see how Digg's current "mechanism" is ironic? Is Digg supposed to be some great model of the utopian government? How do we reconcile flat out "mob rule" versus "the tyranny of the few"?

Posted on Jul 27, 2006
Gene says...

Also I do not see how Digg's current "mechanism" is ironic? Is Digg supposed to be some great model of the utopian government?

Right. I think the irony is that Digg is promoted as a democracy--by Kevin Rose and other supporters, and this seems to be a widely accepted "fact" in the Digg community. At the same time the community has no access to the levers of power (the algorithm), and is largely okay with Kevin's benevolent dictatorship. That seems ironic to me.

Posted on Jul 27, 2006
Gene says...

Yoz, thanks for the comment (sorry it took so long to get it out of moderation). I haven't played with Ning much, but I'll check it out.

Posted on Jul 28, 2006

Post a comment

Remember me?

Basic HTML is allowed.

 

About this Page

Posted by Gene Smith on Jul 27, 2006. Before this there was links for 2006-07-27. Next up is links for 2006-07-28.

About the Author

Gene Smith is a principal with nForm, one of Canada's leading user experience consulting firms. He writes about information architecture, interaction design, community, the web and other such topics. More >

Subscribe

Get the feed Get the RSS feed (full posts, no ads)

My Book

Recent Posts

Archives

Elsewhere

You can also find me on Flickr, Upcoming, LinkedIn, Del.icio.us and Digg.

Work

nForm User Experience

Endorsements

Hosting by Dreamhost.