Folksonomies and i18n

Peter Van Dijck's got an interesting post up on emergent i18n (internationalization) effects in folksonomies. I thought these two points were really good:

Many user populations around the world incorporate words in multiple languages in their vocabulary. The language namespaces I am talking about might not map perfectly to a specific language, but include words in other languages, and slang and such, and in this way be a much better representation of the real language of a certain user population than if we were to just use one language. So it’s not so much about language namespaces, it’s more about user population namespaces. Language is just a starting point and might be an easy way to group user populations.

As an aside, I think the real innovation with folksonomies will come from creating algorythms. It’s all about scalability. The way Google’s superior algorythm in search made them the nr1 search engine, someone will invent superior algorythms in tagging and this may make them the nr1 tagging engine.

I like the idea of user population namespaces--and I can see the value in separating them, whether it's by language or some more granular criteria. I'm working on a project for a client that incorporates freetagging into a staff directory to capture people's skills and job duties. When one of the IT staff listed ASP as a skill, a person who worked in a field office said "asp... I thought that was a snake." The organization is homogeneous in many ways, but there are still user populations that have very little intersection (though they all speak English). We're looking at different ways of disambiguating these terms within the system while still keeping it open (which I'll probably write about more one day).

For those of you with an interest in information architecture, I'm moderating a panel on folk/social/ethnoclassification at the IA Summit (with great speakers, too). As conferences go, it's one of my favourites. There's always a great mix of the practical and the intellectual, the people are fun, and it's cheap. And it's in Montreal this year.

Trackbacks

alex wright / Jan 18, 2005
Peter van Dijk has penned a few thoughts on folksonomies and language, exploring how distributed freetagging systems allow users to mix and match language terms. Considering whether these implicit language namespaces might reflect actual usage patterns... ...from Folksonomies and language, from Adam to Babel »

 

About this Page

Posted by Gene Smith on Jan 15, 2005. Before this there was Create your own crime scene. Next up is End of the Century.

About the Author

Gene Smith is a principal with nForm, one of Canada's leading user experience consulting firms. He writes about information architecture, interaction design, community, the web and other such topics. More >

Subscribe

Get the feed Get the RSS feed (full posts, no ads)

My Book

Recent Posts

Archives

Elsewhere

You can also find me on Flickr, Upcoming, LinkedIn, Del.icio.us and Digg.

Work

Work

nForm User Experience

You can also check out Kiiro, a better collaboration and project management system for SharePoint.

Endorsements

Hosting by Dreamhost.