New new echo chamber
But reading though it all I feel a bit like I'm caught in a neophiliac feedback loop. No wonder--most of the blogs I regularly read are covering the conference or pointing to coverage of the conference.
The problem with a neophiliac feedback loop is that it amplifies new ideas regardless of their other merits (or, I guess, demerits). Everything is just peels of squealing coolness.
And that's the point of these conferences in a way. Synergy and all that. But amid the noise and, no doubt, distortion, the skeptic in me can't help but wonder: Which of these ideas really has legs? Which will we be talking about in two years or five years?

